Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 22/08/2022
Abstract Views: 239
Views PDF: 109
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v517i1.3192
Issue
Vol. 517 No. 1 (2022)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Thị Việt Dung, P. ., Kim Nhã, L. ., Thị Hồng Thúy, T. ., & Hồng Chiến, V. . (2022). EVALUATION THE RESULTS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT OF GYNECOMASTIA. Vietnam Medical Journal, 517(1). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v517i1.3192

EVALUATION THE RESULTS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT OF GYNECOMASTIA

Phạm Thị Việt Dung1,2, Lê Kim Nhã2,, Tạ Thị Hồng Thúy1,2, Vũ Hồng Chiến1
1 Bach Mai Hospital
2 Hanoi Medical University

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: The article aims to assess the results of treatment of gynecomastia by using periareolar skin incisions. Methods: Our study was peformed on 31 patients was diagnosed with gynecomastia at Saint Paul hospital and Bach Mai hospital in the period of time between 2010 and 2022. 26/31 patients were used skin incision in lower haft of areola (Webster’s technique) and 5/31 were used skin incision in upper haft of areola. Results: The postoperative follow-up time was from 6 month to 8 years. 100% nipple-areolar complex had good vitality and sensation, 93,55% patients were satisfied with breast shape, 87,09% pleasant scars, 90,32% patients were very satisfied with the result of treatment. Conclusion: Periareola incision was the good choice for surgical treatment of patients who diagnosed with grade I to IIB gynecomastia.

Article Details

Keywords

gynecomastia, classification, mastectomy

References

1. B. H. Fruhstorfer and C. M. Malata, “A systematic approach to the surgical treatment of gynaecomastia,” Br. J. Plast. Surg., vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 237–246, Apr. 2003, doi: 10.1016/s0007-1226(03)00111-5.
2. A. Longheu et al., “Surgical management of gynecomastia: experience of a general surgery center,” Il G. Chir., vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 150–154, Aug. 2016, doi: 10.11138/gchir/2016.37.4.150.
3. H. Rosen et al., “Adolescent gynecomastia: not only an obesity issue,” Ann. Plast. Surg., vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 688–690, May 2010, doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3181dba827.
4. B. Ladizinski, K. C. Lee, F. N. U. Nutan, H. W. Higgins, and D. G. Federman, “Gynecomastia: etiologies, clinical presentations, diagnosis, and management,” South. Med. J., vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 44–49, Jan. 2014, doi: 10.1097/ SMJ.0000000000000033.
5. B. E. Simon, S. Hoffman, and S. Kahn, “Classification and surgical correction of gynecomastia,” Plast. Reconstr. Surg., vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 48–52, Jan. 1973, doi: 10.1097/00006534-197301000-00009.
6. R. C. Caridi, “Defining the Aesthetic Units of the Male Chest and How They Relate to Gynecomastia Based on 635 Patients,” Plast. Reconstr. Surg., vol. 142, no. 4, pp. 904–907, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004807.
7. M. Nydick, J. Bustos, J. H. Dale, and R. W. Rawson, “Gynecomastia in adolescent boys,” JAMA, vol. 178, pp. 449–454, Nov. 1961, doi: 10.1001/jama.1961.03040440001001.
8. V. Lemaine, C. Cayci, P. S. Simmons, and P. Petty, “Gynecomastia in adolescent males,” Semin. Plast. Surg., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 56–61, Feb. 2013, doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1347166.