RESULTS OF WOUND HEALING WITH DR.ECA MOUTHWASH AFTER WISDOM TEETH EXTRACTION USING THE IPR SCALE

Đỗ Thị Kim Oanh1,, Đặng Triệu Hùng1
1 Hanoi Medical University

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: Describe the healing state after wisdom teeth extraction surgery guided by the use of Dr.ECA mouthwash using the IPR scale. Results were evaluated at 2 time points: day 5 after tooth extraction (corresponding to the inflammatory phase) and day 14 after tooth extraction (corresponding to the proliferative phase). Materials and methods: The patient came to the oral health examination at the Department of Odonto-Stomatology, Hanoi Medical University Hospital. Clinically and radiographically, the mandibular wisdom tooth was diagnosed in group II according to the Parant classification, and was invited to the study. Research methods: cross-sectional description, prospective, convenient sample selection. Sample size N=60. Results: The mean score of wound healing at the inflammatory stage in the study was 6.82±1.03 (maximum score of 8) within the study range (4-8). The mean score of healing at the proliferative stage in the study was 4.68±0.5 (maximum score of 5) within the study range (3-5). At the 5th day after tooth extraction, the patient was assessed to have a good wound healing rate of 95%; the average healing rate is 5%; No poor healing was noted. At the 14th day after tooth extraction, the good healing rate was 98.33%; The average degree of healing accounted for 1.67% and no cases of poor healing were recorded. At the two evaluation points, the good healing rate decreased with age and the healing rate was better in men than in women, but the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Using Dr.ECA mouthwash has a positive healing effect. The good healing rate at day 5 after wisdom tooth extraction was 95%. The good healing rate at day 14 after wisdom tooth extraction was 98.33%. No difference was found in the extent of healing by age and by sex. The IPR scale describes the lesions in the mouth in detail according to the healing stages to help detect early and avoid missing unusual developments of the patient.

Article Details

References

1. Shugars DA, Gentile MA, Ahmad N, et al. Assessment of oral health-related quality of life before and after third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;64(12):1721-1730. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2006.03.052
2. Cho H, Lynham A, Hsu E. Postoperative interventions to reduce inflammatory complications after third molar surgery: review of the current evidence. Australian Dental Journal. 2017;62 (4):412-419. doi:10.1111/adj.12526
3. PGS.TS Võ Trương Như Ngọc. Kết quả điều trị viêm lợi có sử dụng dung dịch khử khuẩn bằng công nghệ hoạt hóa(Dr.ECA). Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 2018;463(2):1-4.
4. PGS.TS Võ Trương Như Ngọc. Nghiên Cứu Ứng Dụng Dung Dịch Dr.ECA Trong Lĩnh Vực Răng Hàm Mặt: So Sánh Kết Quả Điều Trị Hỗ Trợ Viêm Lợi Của Dung Dịch Nước Muối Điện Hóa Dr. ECA và Dung Dịch Nước Súc Miệng KIN Gingival. Trường đại học Y Hà Nội; 2018.
5. Miloro M, Ghali GE, Larsen PE, Waite PD. Peterson’s Principles of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Vol 1. Springer; 2004.
6. Hamzani Y, Chaushu G. Evaluation of early wound healing scales/indexes in oral surgery: A literature review. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. 2018;20(6):1030-1035. doi: 10.1111/ cid.12680
7. Yahya BH, Chaushu G, Hamzani Y. Evaluation of Wound Healing Following Surgical Extractions Using the IPR Scale. International Dental Journal. 2021;71(2):133-139. doi:10.1111/idj.12622