THE RESULT OF SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF POST OPERATIVE OBSTRUCTION
Main Article Content
Abstract
Patient and method: Retrospective study. Time: 1/2018-12/2018. Result: There were 30 patients of postoperative obstruction were observed in K hospital. The mean age was: 56,0; male 76,7%, femail 23,3%, History feature: There were 66,7% had history of one abdominal surgery, 33,3% had more than 2 abdominal surgery; 66,6% were coloreral cancer operation; 30,0% were gastric cancer operation. Clinical feature: Abdominal pain 100%, vomissement: 57,7%, Gazless 90,0%, bowel mouvement 80,0%, abdominalfullness: 90,0%. Plain badominal X-Ray: all had air-fluid level (100%),CT Scan were carried out in 96,7%, the sign of intertinal dilatation was 93,1%, one case of bowel anemie due to intertinal torsion and 5 reccurent patients were detected on CT scan. The result of operation: Open surgery were perfomed in all patients. There were 7(23,5%) patients had adhesive intertinal obstruction,10 patients had obstruction on band (33,3%), 5 patients (16,6%) had torsion obstruction, 5 others patients (16,6%) had recurrent obstruction, 3 patients had phytobezoar obtruction. Operation perfomed: all had open surgery including adhesiolysis; band resection and adhesiolysis, intertinal resection (necroses oj bowel due to torsion or band), colon resection, colostomy (recurrence), liberation of phytobezoar. There was no death per and postoperation. Complication: 1 patient had digestive fistulas post adhesiolysis and bypass operation who had medical treatment. - Conclusion: We conclude that: In our study there were 66,6% of patients who had post operative obstruction after colo-rectal cancer operation (20,0% post Harmann procedure), 30,0% of patients after gastric cancr surgery. There were mainly adhesive and/or band and torsion obstruction as high as 73,3%, recurrent cancer obstruction was 16,7%, phytobezoar obtruction post gastrectomy was 10,0%. All the patients had open operation. There was no death per and post operation.1 patient had digestive fistulas treated medical. We find that laparosopic operation could be performed in 50,0% of patients especially who had adhesive, band, torsion, phytobezoar obstruction.
Article Details
References
2. Nguyễn Văn Hải, Lê Huy Lưu,Nguyễn Hồng Sơn (2008):”Hiệu quả của phẫu thuật nội soi trông điều trị tắc ruột sau mổ”.Y học TP.Hồ Chí Minh,12(1),tr.154-160.
3. Đặng Ngọc Hùng (2018): Nghiên cứu chỉ định và đánh giá kết quả phẫu thuật nội soi điều trị tắc ruột sau mổ, Luận án tiến sỹ Y học, Huế 2018.
4. Catena. F (2011): Bologna Guidelines for Diagnosis and Management of adhesive small bowel obstruction(ASBO):2010 Evidece-Based Guidelines of the World Society of Emergency Surgery,World J Emerg Surg,6(5),pp 1749-9992..
5. Cox.M.R., (1993), THe safety and duration of non operative treatment for adhesive small bowel obstruction,Aust N Z J Surg,63(5),pp.367-371.10.
6. Maglinte D.D, Kelvin. F.M., Kelvin. F.M., Sandrasegaran K., et al (2005) Radiology of small bowel obstruction:Comtemporary approach and controversies.Abdom Imaging, 30(2), pp 160-178.12.
7. Miller.G., Boman.J., Shrier.., et al (2000), Natural history of patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction,Br J Surg,87(9),pp.1240-1247.
8. Ogata M., Mateer , J., Con Don. R.E (1996), Prospective evaluation of abdominal sonogaphy for the diagnosis of bowel obstruction, Ann Surg,223(3), pp.237-241
9. Hayakawa. K., Tanikake (2013): CT findings of small bowel strangulation: the importance of constrast enhancement, Emergency Radiology, 20(1),pp.3-9.
10. Wang, Q.C (2012), Utinity of CT in the diagnosis and management of small bowel abstruction in children,Pdiatric Radiology, 42(12), pp.1441-1448.