Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 07/03/2023
Abstract Views: 203
Views PDF: 109
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v523i2.4538
Issue
Vol. 523 No. 2 (2023)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Nguyễn, C. H. ., & Đinh, C. Định . (2023). COMPARISION DOSIMETRIC DISTRIBUTION OF 3D, FiF, IMRT, VMAT RADIATION TREATMENT PLAN FOR COSERVATIVE BREAST CANCER. Vietnam Medical Journal, 523(2). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v523i2.4538

COMPARISION DOSIMETRIC DISTRIBUTION OF 3D, FiF, IMRT, VMAT RADIATION TREATMENT PLAN FOR COSERVATIVE BREAST CANCER

Công Hoàng Nguyễn1,, Công Định Đinh1
1 National cancer hospital

Main Article Content

Abstract

Adjuvant RT for conservative breast cancer is the standard of treatment. Aims to compare radiation dose distribution of 3D, FiF, IMRT và VMAT treatment plan. Methods: 60 BC stage I-II who were treated from 2016 - 2019. Compare 3D-wedges to IMRT (FIF) plan for HI, CI, UI, Dmax, Dmean at PTV, V95%, V107%; OAR: Dmax, Dmean V10, V20, V5 lung, heart. Result: All 3D, FinF, IMRT and VMAT treatment plans meet the standards of radiation dose at PTV and OARs about dose HI, UI of radiotherapy plan by Intensity-modulated radiation therapy techniques are better than 3D radiotherapy with significantly improved HI and CI indexes, the difference is statistically significant. V3, V5 in lung and heart of IMRT, VMAT plan are significantly higher than FiF and 3D radiation Conclusion: 3D, FinF, IMRT and VMAT techniques in conservative breast cancer all met the standards of distribution and dose limitation at PTV and OAR. With IMRT and VMAT plans: V3, V5 were higher in the lungs and heart. In left breast cancer, some patients need to be considered using motion management to actively reduce radiation dose to the heart.

Article Details

Keywords

Xạ trị 3D, FiF, IMRT và VMAT; Dmax, Dmean, HI, CI, V107, V5, V10, V20

References

1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal. A Global cancer statistics 2020; CA Cancer J Clin, Published online 2020.
2. Kim Z, Min SY, Yoon CS, et al: The basic facts of Korean breast cancer in 2011: results of a nationwide survey and breastcancer registry database. J Breast Cancer 17:99-106 (2014).
3. Solin LJ, Chu JC, Sontag MR, et al: Three-dimensional photon treatment planning of the intact breast. Int J RadiatOncolBiolPhys 21:193-203 (1991).
4. Sasaoka M, Futami T: Dosimetric evaluation of whole breastradiotherapy using field-in-field technique in early-stage breastcancer. Int J ClinOncol 16:250-256 (2011)
5. Onal C, Sonmez A, Arslan G: Dosimetric comparison of the field-in-field technique and tangential wedged beams for breastirradiation. Jpn J Radiol 30:218-226 (2012)
6. Barnett GC, Wilkinson J, Moody AM, et al: A randomizedcontrolled trial of forward-planned radiotherapy (IMRT) for early breast cancer: Baseline characteristics and dosimetry results. RadiotherOncol 92:34-41 (2009).
7. Blom Goldman U, Anderson M, Wennberg B, et al: Radiation pneumonitis and pulmonary function with lung dose volume constraints in breast cancer irradiation. J RadiotherPract13:211-217 (2014).
8. Murat Beyzadeoglu, Gokhan Ozyigit và Cüneyt Ebruli (2010). Basic Radiaton Oncology, Springer, NewYork.
9. E. Haciislamoglu, F. Colak, E. Canyilmaz et al. (2016). The choice of multi-beam IMRT for whole breast radiotherapy in early-stage right breast cancer. Springerplus, 5(1), 688.