Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 24/03/2023
Abstract Views: 241
Views PDF: 232
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v524i1B.4732
Issue
Vol. 524 No. 1B (2023)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Nguyễn, T. M. H. ., Lê, T. T. H. ., Trịnh , Đình H. ., & Nguyễn, T. H. . (2023). EVALUATION OF TREATMENT RESULTS IN PATIENTS WITH ANGLE CLASS I MALOCCLUSION, NONEXTRACTION USING SELF-LIGATING BRACKETS AND BROADER ARCHWIRES. Vietnam Medical Journal, 524(1B). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v524i1B.4732

EVALUATION OF TREATMENT RESULTS IN PATIENTS WITH ANGLE CLASS I MALOCCLUSION, NONEXTRACTION USING SELF-LIGATING BRACKETS AND BROADER ARCHWIRES

Thị Mỹ Hạnh Nguyễn1,, Thị Thu Hà Lê2, Đình Hải Trịnh 3, Thanh Huyền Nguyễn1
1 National Hospital of Odonto-Stomatology, Hanoi
2 108 Military Central Hospital
3 VNU Hanoi-University of Medicine and Pharmacy

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the results of treatment of class I malocclusion, crowded teeth by self-ligating bracket system and broader archwire,  nonextraction. Subjects and research methods: A uncontrolled clinical intervention study, evaluating the results before and after was performed on 38 patients diagnosed with Angle’s class I malocclusion. Patients were checked for indicators of PAR, arch width, indices of hard and soft tissue on cephalometric films before and after treatment. The above parameters are collected, analyzed and verified by suitable tests. Research results: crowded teeth no longer after treatment, most patients have a good improvement in PAR(W); arch width increases after treatment; hard and soft tissue indices remained mostly unchanged; 100% of study subjects had good treatment results.

Article Details

Keywords

Angle class I malocclusion, nonextraction, self-ligating brackets, broader archwire

References

1. Đống Khắc Thẩm. Khảo Sát Tình Trạng Khớp Cắn ở Người Việt Trong Độ Tuổi 17-27. Luận văn tốt nghiệp thạc sĩ y học. Trường Đại học Y Dược thành phố Hồ Chí Minh; 2000.
2. Stolzenberg J. The Russell attachment and its improved advantages. International Journal of Orthodontia and Dentistry for Children. 1935;21(9):837-840.
3. Nguyễn Mỹ Huyền, Lê Nguyên Lâm. Nghiên cứu đặc điểm lâm sàng, cận lâm sàng và kết quả điều trị sai lệch khớp cắn loại I Angle ở sinh viên Răng hàm mặt Trường Đại học Y Dược Cần Thơ. Tạp chí y Dược học Cần Thơ. 2018;16:1-8.
4. Phạm Thu Trang. Nghiên Cứu Đặc Điểm Lâm Sàng, Xquang và Đánh Giá Kết Quả Điều Trị Lệch Lạc Khớp Cắn Angle Có Cắn Sâu Bằng Hệ Thống Máng Chỉnh Nha Trong Suốt. Luận án Tiến sĩ Y học. Viện Nghiên cứu Khoa học Y Dược Lâm sàng 108; 2022.
5. Pandis N, Polychronopoulou A, Eliades T. Self-ligating vs conventional brackets in the treatment of mandibular crowding: a prospective clinical trial of treatment duration and dental effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;132:178-181.
6. Birnie DJ. The Damon passive self-ligating appliance system. Semin Orthod. 2008;14:19-35.
7. Basciftci FA, Akin M, Ileri Z, Bẩym S. Long-term stability of dentoalveolar, skeletal, and soft tissue changes after non-extraction treatment with a self-ligating system. Korean J Orthod. 2014;44(3):119-129.
8. Atik E, Ciger S. An assessment of conventional and self-ligating brackets in Class I maxillary constriction patients. Angle Orthod. 2014;84(4):615-622.
9. Atik E, Akarsu-Guven B, Kocadereli I. Mandibular dental arch changes with active self-ligating brackets combined with different archwires. Niger J Clin Pract. 2018;21(5):566-572.
10. Vajaria R, BeGole E, Kusnoto B, Galang MT, Obrez A. Evaluation of incisor position and dental transverse dimen- sional changes using the Damon system. Angle Orthod. 2011;81:647-652.