CHARACTERISTICS OF PROGNOSTIC FACTORS OF MULTIPLE MYELOMA PATIENTS
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To analyze the characteristics of prognostic factors in patients with multiple myeloma at the Ho Chi Minh city Blood Transfusion Hematology Hospital. Subjects and methods: A descriptive and analytical study on 189 patients newly diagnosed with multiple myeloma from January 2017 to June 2022 according to IMWG 2014 standards who came for examination and treatment at the Ho Chi Minh city Blood Transfusion Hematology Hospital. Results: 5.59% lost chromosomes and 5.59% had extra chromosomes or polyploidy. 50/71 patients detected chromosomal mutations by FISH technique, in which the ratio t(4;14)(p16;q32) was 26.76%, del(17p) was 11.27% and t(14,16) )(q32;q23) accounted for 5.63%, del 13q accounted for 26.76%. According to the Mayo clinic classification, the standard risk was 66.2%, the average risk was 18.31% and the high risk was 15.49%, respectively, according to the R-ISS classification stage I, II, III respectively was 8.45%, 80.28% and 11.27%. High-risk group by age ≥ 65 accounted for 37.57%, ECOG ≥ 2 accounted for 81.48%, plasma cell rate ≥ 30% was 48.15%, Hb < 100 g/L was 59.79%, NLR ≥ 2.25 was 44.44%, SLTC < 150 G/L was 26.98%. The risk according to FLCr ≥ 100 or ≤ 0.01 was 37.50%, calcium concentration ≥ 2.67 mmol/L was 30.98%, β2M concentration ≥ 5.5 mg/L was 70.90%. Conclusion: chromosomal mutation, older age over 65, ECOG ≥ 2, plasma cell rate ≥ 30%, Hb < 100 g/L, NLR ≥ 2.25, SLTC < 150 G/L, FLCr ≥ 100 or ≤ 0.01, calcium concentration ≥ 2.67 mmol/L, β2M concentration ≥ 5.5 mg/L were major prognostic factors for patients with multiple myeloma.
Article Details
Keywords
prognostic factors, multiple myeloma
References
2. Đỗ Trung Phấn (2007). Đa u tuỷ xương. Bài giảng sau đại học Huyết học truyền máu: 176- 186.
3. N. V. Smadja, C. Bastard, C. Brigaudeau, et al. (2001). Hypodiploidy is a major prognostic factor in multiple myeloma. Blood, 98(7): 2229-38.
4. Nguyễn Thùy Dương (2018). Nghiên cứu đặc điểm lâm sàng, cận lâm sàng và kết quả điều trị trong bệnh đa u tủy xương chuỗi nhẹ tại Viện Huyết học- Truyền máu Trung Ương. Luận văn thạc sỹ y học.
5. S. V. Rajkumar, S. Kumar (2016). Multiple Myeloma: Diagnosis and Treatment. Mayo Clin Proc, 91(1): 101-19.
6. Antonio Palumbo, Hervé Avet-Loiseau, Stefania Oliva, et al. (2015). Revised International Staging System for Multiple Myeloma: A Report From International Myeloma Working Group. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 33(26): 2863-2869.
7. J. Qian, J. Jin, H. Luo, et al. (2017). Analysis of clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of multiple myeloma: a retrospective single-center study of 787 cases. Hematology, 22(8): 472-476.
8. A. Romano, N. L. Parrinello, M. L. Consoli, et al. (2015). Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) improves the risk assessment of ISS staging in newly diagnosed MM patients treated upfront with novel agents. Ann Hematol, 94(11): 1875-83.
9. G. W. Lee, S. W. Park, S. I. Go, et al. (2018). The Derived Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Is an Independent Prognostic Factor in Transplantation Ineligible Patients with Multiple Myeloma. Acta Haematologica, 140(3): 146-156.
10. Shaji K. Kumar, Terry M. Therneau, Morie A. Gertz, et al. (2004). Clinical Course of Patients With Relapsed Multiple Myeloma. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 79(7): 867-874.