Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 24/03/2023
Abstract Views: 123
Views PDF: 81
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v524i1B.4784
Issue
Vol. 524 No. 1B (2023)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Hoàng, G. D. ., & Nguyễn, V. T. . (2023). X-RAY AND COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IMAGING IN DIAGNOSIS OF C1-C2 TRAUMATIC DISLOCATION. Vietnam Medical Journal, 524(1B). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v524i1B.4784

X-RAY AND COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IMAGING IN DIAGNOSIS OF C1-C2 TRAUMATIC DISLOCATION

Gia Du Hoàng1,, Văn Trung Nguyễn1
1 Bach Mai hospital

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: Analyzing and comparing of x-ray and computed tomography imaging features in diagnosis of C1-C2 traumatic dislocation. Methods: Cross-sectional descripted retrospective studing of 13 traumatic C1-C2 fracture patients were diagnosed in Viet Duc hospital from January 2010 to June 2012. Results: On X-ray images: C1-C2 dislocation was mostly diagnosed by sagittal plane x-rays (92,3%), anterior-posterior plane x-rays could not show C1-C2 dislocation. The corresponding ratio of x-ray and computed tomography scan was quiet low (Kappa = 0,4797). Type 2 and Type 3 of C1-C2 dislocation were the most popular rate (69,2%), type 4 was lower (23,1%), that all were odontoid pseudoarthrosis. Conclusion: lateral X-ray was worth in C1-C2 dislocation diagnosis. Moreover, 3 dimensions computed tomography was more effective in diagnosis of C1-C2 traumatic dislocation.

Article Details

Keywords

X-rays, computed tomography, C1-C2 dislocation.

References

1. Joaquim AF, Patel AAJCSS. C1 and C2 spine trauma: evaluation, classification, and treatment. 2010;11(3):1-7.
2. Clark CR, Benzel EC. The cervical spine. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005.
3. Fukui Y, Krag M, Huston D, Ambrose T, Vaccaro ARJS. Halovest dynamic loads: full crossover comparison of three vest types. 2002;27(3):241-249.
4. Minyu Z, Shiyang W, Suraj C, Kelun H, Chaowei L, Honglin T. Traumatic Posterolateral C1-C2 Dislocation Complicated with Locked Lateral Mass and Type II Odontoid Fracture—5-Year Follow-up. World Neurosurgery. 2018/06/01/ 2018;114:330-334. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.03.191.
5. Puttlitz CM, Goel VK, Clark CR, Traynelis VC, Scifert JL, Grosland NMJS. Biomechanical rationale for the pathology of rheumatoid arthritis in the craniovertebral junction. 2000;25(13):1607-1616.
6. Burton DC, Noack J, Vaccaro AR, Anderson DGJFotC, Thoracic,, Lumbar Spine. New York NMD, Inc. Cervical Orthoses and Halo-Vest Management. 2002;288.
7. Michel C, Dijanic C, Abdelmalek G, Sudah S, Kerrigan D, Yalamanchili PJJoSS. Upper cervical spine instability systematic review: a bibliometric analysis of the 100 most influential publications. 2022;8(2):266.
8. Van Goethem JW, van den Hauwe L, Parizel PM, Algra P. Spinal imaging: diagnostic imaging of the spine and spinal cord. Springer; 2007.
9. He H, Hu B, Wang L, Gao Y, Yan H, Wang JJTSJ. The computed tomography angiography study of the spatial relationship between C1 transpedicular screw trajectory and V3 segment of vertebral artery. 2017;17(1):120-128.
10. Du HG. Nghiên cứu chẩn đoán và phẫu thuật vít qua khớp trong điều trị chấn thương mất vững C1-C2. Luận án tiến sĩ y học, Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội. 2012.