Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 27/04/2023
Abstract Views: 241
Views PDF: 88
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v525i2.5240
Issue
Vol. 525 No. 2 (2023)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Lục , T. H. N. ., Trần, N. D. ., & Hoàng, Đình Âu . (2023). EVALUATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE DYNAMIC PELVIC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING AND CLINIC ON THE PATIENTS WITH CONSERVATIVE UTERIN PROLAPSE SURGERY. Vietnam Medical Journal, 525(2). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v525i2.5240

EVALUATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE DYNAMIC PELVIC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING AND CLINIC ON THE PATIENTS WITH CONSERVATIVE UTERIN PROLAPSE SURGERY

Thị Huyền Ngọc Lục 1, Ngọc Dũng Trần2, Đình Âu Hoàng2,
1 Hanoi medical university
2 Hanoi medical university hospital

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the relationship between Dynamic Pelvic Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DP-MRI) characteristics and clinic on the patients with conservative uterine prolapse surgery. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study on 19 patients with clinical symptoms of uterine prolapse, underwent DP-MRI and conservative repair surgery at Hanoi Medical University Hospital from October 2021 to November 2022. Results: Mean age was 67,47 ± 11,29, most of them (95 %) were over 50 y.o. The mean birthrate was 2,37 ± 1.0, in which the number of twice giving birth was 85%, mostly in vaginal delivery (90%). Palpable intra-vaginal mass was the most common clinical symptoms and usually associated with defecation and/or urinate problem. The rate of associate cystocele, peritonela prolapse in each degree of uterine prolapse on DP-MRI was statistically significant differentce (95% CI).  However, there was no statistically significant difference between the degree of uterine prolapse/vaginal vault and the ratio of associated rectocele/rectal prolapse. There is a very low consensus between the clinical and the DP-MRI on the uterus prolapse grading. Conclusion: Dynamic Pelvic Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DP-MRI) played an important role in the grading of uterus prolapse and in the evaluation of associated lesions, contributed to a better surgical prognosis.

Article Details

Keywords

genital prolapse, dynamic pelvic magnetic resonance imaging, conservative surgery

References

1. Tú C.K., An B.C., và Tâm P.V. (2013). Kỹ thuật điều trị sa sinh dục có bảo tồn tử cung tại Bệnh viện Trung ương Huế. Tạp Chí Phụ Sản, 11(4), 50–54.
2. Rogers R.G., Pauls R.N., Thakar R. và cộng sự. (2018). An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for the assessment of sexual health of women with pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecology J, 29(5), 647–666.
3. Mant J., PAINTER R., VASSEY M. và cộng sự. OBSERVATIONS FROM THE OXFORD FAMILY PLAN-NING ASSOCIATION STUDY. BR JObstet GYNAECOL 1997 104 579, 585.
4. Võ Tấn Đức, Nguyễn Thị Thùy Linh, và Phạm Ngọc Hoa (2009). CHT động trong đánh giá các bệnh lý vùng sàn chậu. Tạp Chí Học TP Hồ Chí Minh, 13:292-297.
5. Nguyễn Thị Mến (2020). Đặc điểm lâm sàng và cộng hưởng từ trong các bệnh lý sa sàn chậu. Trường Đại Học Hà Nội.
6. Ridgeway B., Walters M.D., Paraiso M.F.R. và cộng sự. (2008). Early experience with mesh excision for adverse outcomes after transvaginal mesh placement using prolapse kits. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 199(6), 703. e1-703. e7.
7. Broekhuis S.R., Fütterer J.J., Barentsz J.O. và cộng sự. (2009). A systematic review of clinical studies on dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic organ prolapse: the use of reference lines and anatomical landmarks. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct, 20(6), 721–729.
8. Tunn R., Paris S., Taupitz M. và cộng sự. (2000). MR imaging in posthysterectomy vaginal prolapse. Int Urogynecology J, 11(2), 87–92.
9. Nguyễn Văn Ân và Đoàn Vương Kiệt (2021). So sánh các phương pháp đánh giá mức độ sa tạng chậu theo Baden –Walker, POP-Q và cộng hưởng từ động học. Bệnhviện Đại Học Dược Tp HồChí Minh.
10. Comiter C.V., Vasavada S.P., Barbaric Z.L. và cộng sự. (1999). Grading pelvic prolapse and pelvic floor relaxation using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Urology, 54(3), 454–457.