Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 16/05/2023
Abstract Views: 317
Views PDF: 121
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v526i1A.5330
Issue
Vol. 526 No. 1A (2023)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Đặng , T. B. N. ., & Hoàng, Đình Âu . (2023). EVALUATION OF THE TYPES OF GLENOID LABRUM LESION ON SHOULDER MR- ARTHROGRAPHY: COMPARISON TO ENDOSCOPIC SHOULDER SURGERY. Vietnam Medical Journal, 526(1A). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v526i1A.5330

EVALUATION OF THE TYPES OF GLENOID LABRUM LESION ON SHOULDER MR- ARTHROGRAPHY: COMPARISON TO ENDOSCOPIC SHOULDER SURGERY

Thị Bích Nguyệt Đặng 1, Đình Âu Hoàng2,
1 Hanoi medical university hospital
2 Hanoi medical university

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purposes: To evaluate the types of glenoid labrum lesions on MR- arthrography in comparison to endoscopic shoulder surgery (ESS). Matherial and Method: The patients who diagnosed the shoulder lesion, underwent the shoulder MR- arthrography and ESS were included in this study. Then, the glenoid labrum lesion that diagnosed on MR- arthrography was compared to the ESS to evalutate the sensibility, specificity and accurate diagnosis of this method. Results: From 1/2016 to 9/2022, fifty patients who underwent the shoulder MR- arthrography and ESS at Hanoi Medical University Hospital. Among them, twenty patients were diagnosed the Bankart lesion, account for 40%. Eleven patients had a SLAP lesion, account for 22% and two patients had the posterior labrum tears, account for 4%. Compared to the ESS, the sensibility, specificity and accurate diagnosis of MR- arthrography were 100%, 96, 8% and 98%, respectively for the diagnosis of Bankart lesion; 100%, 90,7% and 92%, respectively, for the diagnosis of SLAP lesion; 92%, 100% and 96%, respectively, for the diagnosis of posterior labrum tears;   Conclusion: Shoulder MR- arthrography was the high value method for the diagnosis of the types of glenoid labrum lesion.

Article Details

Keywords

Glenoid labrum lesion, Bankart lesion, SLAP lesion, MR arthrography

References

1. Quyền, N.Q., Bài giảng giải phẫu học. 2014. 28-67.
2. Stoller, D.W., Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Chapter 8 The shoulder. 3rd ed. 2007: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
3. Waldt, S., et al., Anterior shoulder instability: accuracy of MR arthrography in the classification of anteroinferior labroligamentous injuries. Radiology, 2005. 237(2): p. 578-83.
4. Lill, H., et al., MRI arthrography--improved diagnosis of shoulder joint instability. Unfallchirurg, 1997. 100(3): p. 186-92.
5. Flannigan, B., et al., MR arthrography of the shoulder: comparison with conventional MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1990. 155(4): p. 829-32.
6. Chung, C.B., L. Corrente, and D. Resnick, MR arthrography of the shoulder. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am, 2004. 12(1): p. 25-38, v-vi.
7. Loh, B., J.B. Lim, and A.H. Tan, Is clinical evaluation alone sufficient for the diagnosis of a Bankart lesion without the use of magnetic resonance imaging? Ann Transl Med, 2016. 4(21): p. 419.
8. Phạm Ngọc Hoa, H.N.T., Hình ảnh rách sụn viền trên cộng hưởng từ có tiêm tương phản nội khớp trong trật khớp vai tái hồi. Y học Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh, 2009. 13: p. 265-270.
9. Hà, P.C., Báo cáo kết quả bước đầu ứng dụng kỹ thuật chụp cộng hưởng từ khớp vai với tiêm tương phản từ nội khớp. 2006.