RESEARCH CHARACTERISTICS OF ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE CHARACTERISTICS OF COMMON GRAM-NEGATIVE BACTERIA CAUSING SEPSIS AT NGHE AN GENERAL FRIENDSHIP HOSPITAL IN 2022
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Gram-negative bacteria are the common cause of sepsis and have increasing antibiotic resistance and multi-resistance tends to increase. Providing information on antibiotic resistance of Gram-negative bacteria is essential for clinical practice. Objective: To study antibiotic resistance characteristics of common gram-negative bacteria causing sepsis at Nghe An General Friendship Hospital. Subjects and methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study, 428 strains of Gram-negative bacteria causing sepsis were collected at Nghe An General Friendship Hospital from 1/2021 to 12/2021. Results: E. coli was resistant to all tested antibiotics: highest with Ampicillin 89.6%, lowest with Fosfomycin 3%, the rate of ESBL-producing is 54.5%. K. pneumoniae was resistant to all tested antibiotics: highest with Ampicillin/Sulbactam 57.1%, lowest with Fosfomycin 11.4%, the rate of ESBL-producing is 15.9%. Burkholderia pseudomallei has not recorded resistance to Carbapenem, Ceftazidime, and resistance to Cotrimoxazone 27.6%. Regarding the type of multi-antibiotic resistance, E. coli had the highest rate of multi-resistance at 80.6%, followed by K. pneumoniae 59.7%. K. pneumoniae has an expanded resistance rate of 23.6%, higher than E. coli (9.3%). MDR, XDR of Burkholderia pseudomallei have not been recorded. Conclusion: The E. coli strain in our study has a relatively high rate of antibiotic resistance and multi-resistance. The proportion of K. pneumoniae with extended resistance is higher than that of E. coli. Multiple resistance and extended multidrug resistance of Burkholderia pseudomallei have not been recorded
Keywords
Gram-negative bacteria, anti-blood, antibiotic, resistant, multi-resistant
Article Details
References
2. Nguyễn Phương Kiệt, Richart K. Root và Richart Jacobs (1995), "Nhiễm trùng máu và sốc nhiễm trùng”", Các nguyên lý y học nội khoa., vol. Tr. 118-127. Nhà xuất bản Y học.
3. Hoàng Thị Thanh Thủy và các cộng sự., “Căn nguyên vi khuẩn gây nhiễm khuẩn huyết tại Bệnh viện Bệnh Nhiệt Đới Trung Ương năm 2012,” Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam, p. 5(2), tr. 89-92., 2013.
4. J.-L. Vincent et al., “Sepsis in European intensive care units: results of the SOAP study,” Crit Care Med, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 344–353, Feb. 2006, doi: 10.1097/ 01.ccm.0000194725.48928.3a.
5. Mai Lan Hương, “Căn nguyên gây nhiễm trùng huyết và mức độ kháng kháng sinh của vi khuẩn phân lập tại Bệnh viện Bạch Mai từ 01/01/2011 đến 30/06/2011,” Đại học Y Hà Nội, 2011.
6. V. Q. Dat et al., “Bacterial bloodstream infections in a tertiary infectious diseases hospital in Northern Vietnam: aetiology, drug resistance, and treatment outcome,” BMC Infect Dis, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 493, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2582-7.
7. P. Sawatwong et al., “High Burden of Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae Bacteremia in Older Adults: A Seven-Year Study in Two Rural Thai Provinces,” Am J Trop Med Hyg, vol. 100, no. 4, pp. 943–951, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.18-0394.
8. E. Garza-González et al., “A snapshot of antimicrobial resistance in Mexico. Results from 47 centers from 20 states during a six-month period,” plos One, vol. 14, no. 3, p. E0209865, 2019, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209865.