Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 15/03/2024
Abstract Views: 65
Views PDF: 53
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v536i1B.8825
Issue
Vol. 536 No. 1B (2024)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Nguyễn , V. T. ., Phan , V. Đức, & Hoàng , M. P. . (2024). PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF CVT-RS SCALE IN PATIENTS WITH CEREBRAL VENOUS THROMBOSIS. Vietnam Medical Journal, 536(1B). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v536i1B.8825

PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF CVT-RS SCALE IN PATIENTS WITH CEREBRAL VENOUS THROMBOSIS

Văn Tuận Nguyễn , Văn Đức Phan , Mai Phương Hoàng

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: Analyzing the prognostic value of the CVT-RS scale in patients with cerebral venous thrombosis. Subjects and methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study of 60 patients with cerebral venous thrombosis was treated at the Neurology Center of Bach Mai Hospital from June 2019 to June 2020. Results: The majority of patients had CVT-RS scores <3 points (76.6%). The most common factor in the CVT-RS score is intracranial hemorrhage (58.3%), followed by male (51.7%). Factors such as a Glasgow score < 9 points, mental disorders, and intracranial hemorrhage are related to a mRS score >2 points with P < 0.05. The CVT-RS score was evaluated at the time of patient discharge to determine the ability to predict clinical recovery at a good level (AUC from 0.8 to less than 0.9), especially 100% of patients have a CVT-RS score of 5 points with poor clinical recovery. The CVT-RS score ≥3 points has poor recovery at discharge (mRS>2) with sensitivity 77.8% and specificity 86.3%; OR = 22.0, (CI 95% (3,776–128,164) (p<0.05). Conclusion: The CVT-RS score can evaluate and predict the severity, disability, or mortality of cerebral venous thrombosis patients.

Article Details

References

1. Saposnik G, Barinagarrementeria F, Brown RD, Jr., et al. Diagnosis and management of cerebral venous thrombosis: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2011; 42(4): 1158-92.
2. Ferro JM, Bacelar-Nicolau H, Rodrigues T, et al. Risk score to predict the outcome of patients with cerebral vein and dural sinus thrombosis. Cerebrovasc Dis 2009; 28(1): 39-44.
3. Rankin J. Cerebral vascular accidents in patients over the age of 60. II. Prognosis. Scott Med J 1957; 2(5): 200-15.
4. Ferro JM, Bousser MG, Canhao P, et al. European Stroke Organization guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of cerebral venous thrombosis - Endorsed by the European Academy of Neurology. Eur Stroke J 2017; 2(3): 195-221.
5. Ferro JM, Lopes MG, Rosas MJ, Ferro MA, Fontes J, Cerebral Venous Thrombosis Portugese Collaborative Study G. Long-term prognosis of cerebral vein and dural sinus thrombosis. results of the VENOPORT study. Cerebrovasc Dis 2002; 13(4): 272-8.
6. Breteau G, Mounier-Vehier F, Godefroy O, et al. Cerebral venous thrombosis 3-year clinical outcome in 55 consecutive patients. J Neurol 2003; 250(1): 29-35.
7. Iqbal N, Sharma A. Cerebral venous thrombosis: a mimic of brain metastases in colorectal cancer associated with a better prognosis. Case Rep Oncol Med 2013; 2013: 109412.
8. Canhao P, Ferro JM, Lindgren AG, et al. Causes and predictors of death in cerebral venous thrombosis. Stroke 2005; 36(8): 1720-5.
9. Sagduyu A, Sirin H, Mulayim S, et al. Cerebral cortical and deep venous thrombosis without sinus thrombosis: clinical MRI correlates. Acta Neurol Scand 2006; 114(4): 254-60.
10. Barboza MA, Chiquete E, Arauz A, et al. A Practical Score for Prediction of Outcome After Cerebral Venous Thrombosis. Front Neurol 2018; 9: 882.