Article Sidebar

pdf
Date Published: 15/04/2024
Abstract Views: 67
Views pdf: 60
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v537i2.9241
Issue
Vol. 537 No. 2 (2024)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Lê, D. L., Lê, T. T. H., & Nguyễn, D. L. (2024). EFFICACY OF LIDOCAINE 2% LOCAL ANESTHETIC IN MANDIBULAR WISDOM TOOTH EXTRACTION SURGERY. Vietnam Medical Journal, 537(2). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v537i2.9241

EFFICACY OF LIDOCAINE 2% LOCAL ANESTHETIC IN MANDIBULAR WISDOM TOOTH EXTRACTION SURGERY

Diệp Linh Lê, Thị Thu Hải Lê, Danh Long Nguyễn

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of 2% lidocaine anesthetic in mandibular wisdom tooth extraction surgery. Subjects and methods: Prospective study, longitudinal follow-up of 60 patients anesthetized with 2% Lidocaine anesthetic during lower wisdom tooth extraction surgery at the Department of Dentistry - Military Hospital 103, from January 2022 to May August 2022. Results: the average dose of local anesthetic (in ml) of Lidocaine 2% was 3.96 ± 0.71 ml, and in mg, it was 79.20 ± 14.14 mg. The average 2% Lidocaine local anesthetic time was 2.60 ± 1.01 minutes. The time when Lidocaine anesthetic takes effect was mostly < 4 minutes, accounting for over 90%. The anesthetic dose needed to add local anesthetic was 1.66 ± 0.34 ml. According to the VAS scale, the evaluation of pain level found that the overall pain level during the entire surgery in the Lidocaine group was 0.96 ± 1.02 points. Conclusion: Lidocaine 2% is a local anesthetic with a rapid anesthetic effect, low rate of need for additional anesthesia, and effective pain relief during and after mandibular wisdom tooth extraction surgery.

Article Details

Keywords

Lidocaine 2%, lower wisdom teeth, anesthetic effect

References

1. s. A. Gandhi, S. Das, A. Das, Et Al. (2021). Anaesthetic Efficacy Of Lidocaine And Articaine In Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Combined With Buccal Infiltration In Patients With Irreversible Pulpitis. Journal Of Pharmacy & Bioallied Sciences, 13(Suppl 1): S731-S734.
2. Kambalimath Dh, Dolas Rs, Kambalimath Hv, Et Al. (2013). Efficacy Of 4 % Articaine And 2 % Lidocaine: A Clinical Study. J Maxillofac Oral Surg, 12(1): 3-10.
3. A. Dugal, R. Khanna, A. Patankar (2009). A Comparative Study Between 0.5% Centbucridine Hcl And 2% Lignocaine Hcl With Adrenaline (1: 2, 00,000). Journal Of Maxillofacial And Oral Surgery, 8(3): 221-223.
4. A. Sierra Rebolledo, E. Delgado Molina, L. Berini Aytés, Et Al. (2007). Comparative Study Of The Anesthetic Efficacy Of 4% Articaine Versus 2% Lidocaine In Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block During Surgical Extraction Of Impacted Lower Third Molars. Medicina Oral, Patología Oral Y Cirugía Bucal (Internet), 12(2): 139-144.
5. Gazal G. (2018). Is Articaine More Potent Than Mepivacaine For Use In Oral Surgery? J Oral Maxillofac Res, 30(9): E5(1-8).
6. M. Sumer, F. Misir, N. Çelebi, Et Al. (2008). A Comparison Of Injection Pain With Articaine With Adrenaline, Prilocaine With Phenylpressin And Lidocaine With Adrenaline. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 13(7): E427-30.
7. Đỗ Thị Nhàn, Nguyễn Khang (2022). So Sánh Hiệu Quả Gây Tê Của Articanie 4% Với Lidocaine 2% Trong Phẫu Thuật Nhổ Răng Khôn Hàm Dưới. Tạp Chí Y Dược Học Quân Sự Số 8 - 2022