Article Sidebar
Views pdf: 209
COMPARABILITY OF BECKMAN COULTER DXC 700 AU AND ROCHE COBAS 8000 AT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HCMC – BRANCH
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objectives: The study aims to compare the results of glucose, cholesterol, triglyceride, SGPT, SGOT assays using patient samples performed on Beckman Coulter DxC 700 AU and Roche Cobas 8000 at University Medical Center HCMC – Branch 2. Methods: Cross – sectional descriptions. Using 40 blood plasma samples with different concentration/ activity performed assays on two devices Beckman Coulter DxC 700 AU and Roche Cobas 8000. Using scatter and Bland – Altman plot analyzing data. Results: All assays have R2>0,95, the correlation equation with slope belongs to (0,9; 1,1) narrower than the suggested range of EP09-A3 of CLSI. The glucose, cholesterol, triglyceride, SGPT, and SGOT assays have an average deviation between two devices within the allowable limits of performance. Conclusion: Glucose, cholesterol, triglyceride, SGPT, SGOT assays of the same blood plasma sample performed on Beckman Coulter DxC 700 AU and Roche Cobas 8000 have the comparability with slope belongs to (0,9; 1,1) narrower than the suggested range of EP09-A3 of CLSI. The glucose, cholesterol, triglyceride, SGPT, and SGOT assays have an average deviation between two devices within the allowable limits of performance.
Article Details
Keywords
correlation, bias, patient samples, EP09-A3.
References
2. Bộ Y tế. Quyết định số 2429/QĐ-BYT. Quyết định về việc Ban hành Tiêu chí đánh giá mức chất lượng phòng xét nghiệm y học. 2017.
3. Lê Đặng Quỳnh Trang, Nguyễn Thị Thanh Hải. So sánh phương pháp hai hệ thống máy xét nghiệm hóa sinh tại Bệnh viện Đa khoa tỉnh Điện Biên. Tạp Chí Y học Việt Nam. 2022;519(1).
4. Phan Thị Thanh Hải, Đặng Thị Ngọc Dung. So sánh sự tương đồng một số xét nghiệm hóa sinh trên hai máy Alinity và Atellica solutions. Tạp chí nghiên cứu y học. 2020;135(11):31-40.
5. CLIA. CLIA proficiency testing criteria for acceptable analytical performance, Federal Register, USA. 2019.
6. CLSI. EP09-A3 Measurement Procedure Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples; Approved Guideline – Third Edition, USA. 2013.
7. RCPA. Allowable limits of performance, Australia. 2014.
8. White GH and Farrance I. AACB Uncertainty of measurement in quantitative medical testing, a laboratory implementation guide. Clin Biochem Rev. 2004; 25(4):S1-24.