Article Sidebar

pdf
Date Published: 18/06/2024
Abstract Views: 72
Views pdf: 17
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v539i1B.9979
Issue
Vol. 539 No. 1B (2024)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Nguyễn, X. P., & Trần, T. K. (2024). RESULT OF SURGERY TREATMENT FOR DOUBLE-LEVEL LUMBAR SPONDYLOLISTHESIS IN 175 MILITARY HOSPITAL. Vietnam Medical Journal, 539(1B). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v539i1B.9979

RESULT OF SURGERY TREATMENT FOR DOUBLE-LEVEL LUMBAR SPONDYLOLISTHESIS IN 175 MILITARY HOSPITAL

Xuân Phương Nguyễn, Trung Kiên Trần

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: The study aimed to evaluate the results of surgery for double-level lumbar spondylolysis using the pedicle screw placement and posterior lumbar interbody fusion at Military Hospital 175. Subjects and methods: The study reported 30 cases with double-level lumbar spondylolysis under operation from January 2021 to May 2024. We collected data, compared symptoms before and after surgery, and evaluated surgical results. Results: 6 months after surgery,  VAS score for lower back decreased from 6.23 to 1.43; VAS score for lower leg declined from 5.87 to 1.23. Spinal function improved, mainly at level 1 (90%) and level 2 (10%); The number of patients having severe level-2- spondylolisthesis was 23.3% (went down from 36.7%  preoperation). There are 90% of patients with full bone healing after 6 months, and only 10% of patients with partly bone healing. There were 6.7% of patients with screw loosening and graft slippage on X-ray 6 months postoperation. Conclusion: Surgery for fixing double-level lumbar spondylolysis using the pedicle screw placement and posterior lumbar interbody fusion had shown a good outcome.

Article Details

Keywords

Double-level lumbar spondylolysis, lumbar spondylolysis, posterior lumbar interbody fusion

References

1. Liu, X., et al., Multiple-level lumbar spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 2015. 22(3): p. 283-287.
2. Song, D., et al., Comparison of posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with autogenous bone chips and PLIF with cage for treatment of double-level isthmic spondylolisthesis. Clinical neurology neurosurgery, 2015. 138: p. 111-116.
3. Zhang, S., et al., Double-level lumbar spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis: A retrospective study. Journal of orthopaedic surgery research, 2018. 13(1): p. 1-7.
4. Vũ, N., Nghiên cứu điều trị trượt đốt sống thắt lưng bằng phương pháp cố định cột sống qua cuống kết hợp hàn xương liên thân đốt 2015, Đại học y Hà Nội: Hà Nội.
5. Hiếu, N.Đ., Kết quả phẫu thuật trượt đốt sống vùng thắt lưng tại Bệnh viện Đa khoa tỉnh Hòa Bình. 2020, Đại học Y Hà Nội.
6. Hùng, K.Đ., et al., Kết quả điều trị trượt đốt sống thắt lưng tại Bệnh viện Đại học Y Hà Nội. Tạp chí Nghiên cứu Y học, 2021. 147(11): p. 169-176.
7. Du, H.G., et al., Kết quả điều trị trượt đốt sống thắt lưng L4L5 bằng phẫu thuật lấy đĩa đệm, cố định cột sống và ghép xương liên thân đốt. Khoa chấn thương chỉnh hình và cột sống – Bệnh viện Bạch Mai, 2016.
8. Cheng, L., L. Nie, and L. Zhang, Posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion in spondylolisthesis: a prospective controlled study in the Han nationality. International orthopaedics, 2009. 33: p. 1043-1047.
9. West 3rd, J., D. Bradford, and J. Ogilvie, Results of spinal arthrodesis with pedicle screw-plate fixation. JBJS, 1991. 73(8): p. 1179-1184.