CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PATIENTS WHO HAVE VOCAL CORD POLYP SURGERY WITH SOFT TUBE AT THE CENTRAL ENT HOSPITAL IN 2021

Ý Thơ Mai, Thanh Thảo Nguyễn, Cảnh Huy Nguyễn, Thị Hiền Phạm, Khắc Hoà Nguyễn, Tấn Quang Nguyễn

Main Article Content

Abstract

Vocal cord polyps are quite common among benign laryngeal diseases, accounting for about 19% - 31% of people who use voice professionally. The study was conducted at the National Ear- Nose and Throat (ENT) Hospital on 36 patients undergoing vocal cord polyp surgery using soft tubes. Results: Hoarseness is the main symptom, seen in 100% of patients. Feeling short of breath and tired speaking occurs in 80.6%. Vocal cord polyps increase disturbances in frequency and amplitude. Jitter and Shimmer indexes are both higher than the control group (Jitter in the disease group 0.996%, control 0.206. Shimmer in the disease group 7.125%, control 1.401%). Vocal cord polyps reduce HNR vocal harmonics (HNR in disease group 14,264 dB, control 23,938 dB). Early diagnosis and timely treatment are needed to improve the patient's voice and prevent complications.

Article Details

References

1. Nguyễn Đức T. Đánh giá kết quả phẫu thuật u lành tính dây thanh bằng phương pháp vi phẫu thanh quản qua nội soi ống mềm. Thesis. 2022. Accessed May 8, 2024. http://dulieuso. hmu.edu.vn/handle/hmu/3956
2. Phạm VT, Nguyễn THY, Trần TN. Đặc điểm lâm sàng của polyp dây thanh tại khoa Tai Mũi Họng Bệnh viện Đa khoa tỉnh Nam Định. VMJ. 2022;516(2). doi:10.51298/vmj.v516i2.3029
3. Hospital TA. Bệnh viện đa khoa Tâm Anh. Bệnh viện Đa khoa Tâm Anh | Tâm Anh Hospital. Published August 31, 2021. Accessed May 9, 2024. https://tamanhhospital.vn/polyp-day-thanh-quan/
4. 09_Phạm Thị Hiền_14100168_Khoa luan.pdf. Accessed May 9, 2024. https:// repository.vnu.edu.vn/bitstream/VNU_123/93565/1/09_Ph%E1%BA%A1m%20Th%E1%BB%8B%20Hi%E1%BB%81n_14100168_Khoa%20luan.pdf
5. Wang CT, Liao LJ, Huang TW, Lo WC, Cheng PW. Comparison of treatment outcomes of transnasal vocal fold polypectomy versus microlaryngoscopic surgery: Comparing Treatment Outcomes of Transnasal VFP Versus MLS. The Laryngoscope. 2015;125(5):1155-1160. doi:10.1002/lary.25088
6. Teixeira JP, Oliveira C, Lopes C. Vocal Acoustic Analysis – Jitter, Shimmer and HNR Parameters. Procedia Technology. 2013;9:1112-1122. doi:10.1016/j.protcy.2013.12.124
7. Sakae F.A, Senes L.U. Vocal fold polyps and cover minimum structural alterations: associated injuries. Rev Bras Otorhinolaryngol. Published online 2004:1-6.
8. Vasconcelos D, Gomes A, Araújo C. Vocal Fold Polyps: Literature Review. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;23(01): 116-124. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1675391
9. Sahin M, Gode S, Dogan M, Kirazli T, Ogut F. Effect of voice therapy on vocal fold polyp treatment. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018; 275(6): 1533-1540. doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-4962-z