Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 13/11/2022
Abstract Views: 212
Views PDF: 130
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v519i2.3629
Issue
Vol. 519 No. 2 (2022)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Văn Hoàn, P. ., & Việt Hằng, Đào . (2022). MUCOSAL ADMITTANCE VALUE IN PATIENTS WITH BARRETT’S ESOPHAGUS. Vietnam Medical Journal, 519(2). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v519i2.3629

MUCOSAL ADMITTANCE VALUE IN PATIENTS WITH BARRETT'S ESOPHAGUS

Phạm Văn Hoàn1, Đào Việt Hằng1,2,
1 Hanoi Medical University
2 Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate esophageal mucosal admittance (MA) values in patients with Barrett's esophagus.Subjects and methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from 9/2021 to 7/2022 on patients with Barrett's esophagus.Results: The study recruited 30 patients with the mean age being 48.2 ± 12.1. The female/male ratio was 1.31. The mean BMI was 22.9 ± 2.9. The mean GERD-Q score was 6.97 ± 1.77. Using the Prague C and M classifications, 93.3% of patients were C0M1 and 6.7% were C0M2. There were 3 cases (10%) with sliding diaphragmatic hernia, 10 cases (33.3%) with erosive esophagitis. The median MA values (interquartile) at 5cm and 15cm above the Z line were 52.10 (30.26 – 77.27) and 51.32 (38.24 – 70.30), respectively. There was a difference of MA values between patients with and without erosive esophagitis. Multivariate regression analysis showed that there was a positive correlation between erosive esophagitis and MA values at both 5cm and 15cm above the Z lines. Conclusion: MA value in patients with Barrett's esophagus were higher than normal people, there was a positive correlation between erosive esophagitis and MA values.

Article Details

Keywords

Barrett’s esophagus, mucosal admittance, TCM (Tissue Conductance Meter)

References

1. Spechler SJ, Fitzgerald RC, Prasad GA, Wang KK. History, Molecular Mechanisms, and Endoscopic Treatment of Barrett’s Esophagus. Gastroenterology. 2010;138(3):854-869. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2010.01.002
2. Fock KM, Talley N, Goh KL, et al. Asia-Pacific consensus on the management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: an update focusing on refractory reflux disease and Barrett’s oesophagus. Gut. 2016;65(9):1402-1415. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2016-311715
3. Fitzgerald RC, di Pietro M, Ragunath K, et al. British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on the diagnosis and management of Barrett’s oesophagus. Gut. 2014;63(1):7-42. doi:10.1136/ gutjnl-2013-305372
4. Matsumura T, Ishigami H, Fujie M, et al. Endoscopic-Guided Measurement of Mucosal Admittance can Discriminate Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease from Functional Heartburn. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2017;8(6):e94. doi:10.1038/ ctg.2017.22
5. Sharma P, Dent J, Armstrong D, et al. The development and validation of an endoscopic grading system for Barrett’s esophagus: the Prague C & M criteria. Gastroenterology. 2006; 131 (5):1392-1399. doi:10.1053/ j.gastro.2006.08.032
6. Levine DS, Blount PL, Rudolph RE, Reid BJ. Safety of a systematic endoscopic biopsy protocol in patients with Barrett’s esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000; 95(5):1152-1157. doi:10.1111/ j.1572-0241.2000.02002.x
7. Lottrup C, Krarup AL, Gregersen H, Ejstrud P, Drewes AM. Patients with Barrett’s esophagus are hypersensitive to acid but hyposensitive to other stimuli compared with healthy controls. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017;29(4). doi:10.1111/ nmo.12992
8. Hằng ĐV, Thành NPT. Kết quả đo điện thế niêm mạc thực quản ở bệnh nhân có viêm thực quản trào ngược trên nội soi. Journal of 108 - Clinical Medicine and Phamarcy. 2021;16(2):1-6. doi:10.52389/ydls.v16i2.670